Skip to main content

A War Crimes Tribunal for Bangladesh

The process of building a society from scratch in the aftermath of any conflict must necessarily involve a judicial intervention. Justice is the surest way to sustainable peace. One may argue that nothing can truly restore losses - but justice offers a way to ensure that those who committed crimes cannot come back to harm the society because they have already been sentenced.

One of the places that most needs a judicial process to try past war crimes is Bangladesh. The birth of the nation involved a harsh struggle that claimed too many lives - as a crime of genocide was allegedly the handiwork of 195 Pakistani military officials who haven’t been tried thus far. Some of the people that even collaborated with the conduct of the war crimes became active politicians and served in governmental posts. In the light of the crimes that unfolded in Bangladesh, a war crimes tribunal is a necessary element in ensuring the delivery of justice that has been long overdue.

The promise of a war crimes tribunal was one of the many things put forth by the ruling party – and this was a linchpin in their attainment of success in the elections. However, the tribunal that did ensue after did not succeed – there were too many outside interventions and the tribunal has been subject to much politicisation, thereby becoming a political weapon for the party in power. This then led to violence.

As is the case with many countries across the world, Bangladesh’s judiciary has no immunities to procedural flaws. It has been politicised, and some in the leadership has had a track record of criminal involvement. Coupled with all of this is the fact that there is no evidence left of the incidents, many of those who could be witnesses in the case are not around anymore, and the trial is likely to hinge on circumstantial evidence, hear say and hand-me-down stories. Consequently, it might make it easier to beat the rules aside and find a way to bend procedure. This would, in turn, give room for more corruption to unfold.

The war crimes tribunal should truly serve the purpose. It needs to cease being a political instrument and evolve as a mechanism that would truly do justice.



India's Role To Create a World Without Nuclear Weapons

[This article is written by our Empaneled Contributor Sarthak Roy] The UNSC (United Nations Security Council) recently passed Resolution 2371 to impose new sanctions on North Korea for its continued intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) tests and violations of UN resolutions. While 122 UN member countries are keen on a nuclear weapon free world, the nine nuclear weapon powers along with the 28 NATO nations chose to abstain from the adoption process on a Draft “Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons” (TPNW) on 07 July 2017. These countries reasoned that the Draft Treaty will not be able to address threats to the existing international security architecture by flagrant violators of international law. Their reference was primarily to North Korean nuclear weapon capabilities. Senior advocate of Supreme Court of India Harish Salve who represented the country at the ICJ in 2016 against the Marshall Islands justified New Delhi’s refusal to sign the NPT based on “enlightened self-intere…

Use Of Human Shield In Kashmir – A Legal Analysis

A lot has been debated and written about the ‘human shield’ incident that happened on April 9, 2017, in Kashmir’s Budgam district. Farooq Ahmed Dar, a 26-year-old shawl weaver of Chil village in Beerwah sub-district was tied in front of an Army Jeep and allegedly paraded through several villages for nearly five hours.[1] The media, lawyers, politicians and even army officers have stark differences of opinion on the legality of the said incident.[2] Major Leetul Gogoi, who tied the victim on the army jeep was awarded chief of army staff’s Commendation Card for sustained efforts in counter-insurgency operations.[3] This award was given pending proceedings before the court of inquiry into the said incident. On the other hand, the victim, Farooq Ahmed Dar approached the State Human Rights Commission against the reward given to Major Gogoi by the Army and separate petitions were filed before the National Human Rights Commission against the felicitation.[4] It is alleged that the actions of…

Charting the economic and political repercussions of Neymar’s transfer

Last week and half, witnessed the long-drawn Neymar Junior transfer come to its conclusion. Yes, Paris Saint Germain finally got their jackpot, for a fee close to 220 million Euros, which would rise close to half a billion Euros with wages included. By the numbers being thrown around, if Neymar was a country, he would rank 206th in terms of GDP, ahead of Marshall Islands and Palau. In the soap opera that unfolded, Neymar’s record transfer fee from Barcelona was twice as much as the previous world record, set last summer when Paul Pogba joined Manchester United. With Qatar bankrolling PSG with its petrodollars, this post would analyse the economic and political ramifications that has shaken up the world of football in the aftermath of this deal of the century. Amidst all the hysteria surrounding the ‘moral hazards’ of clubs dizzying riches, this transfer has the possibility to recalibrate its intentions and responsibilities towards its supporters. 
Failure of Financial Fair Play
The Fin…