Skip to main content

Dr. Neeru Chadha becomes first Indian women to be elected to ITLOS

Dr. Neeru Chadha, who had graduated from the University of Michigan and the University of Delhi, has been elected as the judge of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) becoming the first Indian woman to be elected to ITLOS. Dr. Chadha had joined the Legal and Treaties Division of the Ministry of External Affairs in 1992.

She was also India’s lead agent for both the case filed by Italy in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and at the arbitral tribunal in The Hague, which involved two Italian Marines who were accused of shooting dead two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012 and in the 2016 case before the International Court of Justice, raised by the Marshall Islands with respect to Nuclear Disarmament. 

Dr. Chadha (Left), with Mr. Harish Salve (Center) and French lawyer, Alain Pellet, representing India at the ICJ against the Marshall Islands in 2016.

Dr. Chadha is also the first woman from India to occupy a top UN position, after Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, who served as the President of the United Nations General Assembly. 

Mr. Syed Akbaruddin is India's Ambassador/Permanent Representative to the United Nations 

With this, she also becomes the 3rd female ITLOS Judge at this moment, besides Ms Liesbeth Lijnzaad of the Netherlands, who was also freshly elected and Elsa Kelly of Argentina, (who was elected in 2011).

She also becomes the second Indian, the first one being Justice P Chandrasekhara Rao who was reelected in October 2008, to currently a member of the ITLOS (Dr. Chadha's term officially commences from Oct 2017). The current President of the ITLOS is Russian born, Justice Vladimir Vladimirovich Golitsyn

The current batch of Judges, including Dr. Chadha, have been elected for a term of 9 years commencing 1st October 2017.

ITLOS Press Release can be accessed HERE

Bio Date and all details about the freshly elected Judges can be access HERE



India's Role To Create a World Without Nuclear Weapons

[This article is written by our Empaneled Contributor Sarthak Roy] The UNSC (United Nations Security Council) recently passed Resolution 2371 to impose new sanctions on North Korea for its continued intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) tests and violations of UN resolutions. While 122 UN member countries are keen on a nuclear weapon free world, the nine nuclear weapon powers along with the 28 NATO nations chose to abstain from the adoption process on a Draft “Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons” (TPNW) on 07 July 2017. These countries reasoned that the Draft Treaty will not be able to address threats to the existing international security architecture by flagrant violators of international law. Their reference was primarily to North Korean nuclear weapon capabilities. Senior advocate of Supreme Court of India Harish Salve who represented the country at the ICJ in 2016 against the Marshall Islands justified New Delhi’s refusal to sign the NPT based on “enlightened self-intere…

Use Of Human Shield In Kashmir – A Legal Analysis

A lot has been debated and written about the ‘human shield’ incident that happened on April 9, 2017, in Kashmir’s Budgam district. Farooq Ahmed Dar, a 26-year-old shawl weaver of Chil village in Beerwah sub-district was tied in front of an Army Jeep and allegedly paraded through several villages for nearly five hours.[1] The media, lawyers, politicians and even army officers have stark differences of opinion on the legality of the said incident.[2] Major Leetul Gogoi, who tied the victim on the army jeep was awarded chief of army staff’s Commendation Card for sustained efforts in counter-insurgency operations.[3] This award was given pending proceedings before the court of inquiry into the said incident. On the other hand, the victim, Farooq Ahmed Dar approached the State Human Rights Commission against the reward given to Major Gogoi by the Army and separate petitions were filed before the National Human Rights Commission against the felicitation.[4] It is alleged that the actions of…

Charting the economic and political repercussions of Neymar’s transfer

Last week and half, witnessed the long-drawn Neymar Junior transfer come to its conclusion. Yes, Paris Saint Germain finally got their jackpot, for a fee close to 220 million Euros, which would rise close to half a billion Euros with wages included. By the numbers being thrown around, if Neymar was a country, he would rank 206th in terms of GDP, ahead of Marshall Islands and Palau. In the soap opera that unfolded, Neymar’s record transfer fee from Barcelona was twice as much as the previous world record, set last summer when Paul Pogba joined Manchester United. With Qatar bankrolling PSG with its petrodollars, this post would analyse the economic and political ramifications that has shaken up the world of football in the aftermath of this deal of the century. Amidst all the hysteria surrounding the ‘moral hazards’ of clubs dizzying riches, this transfer has the possibility to recalibrate its intentions and responsibilities towards its supporters. 
Failure of Financial Fair Play
The Fin…