Skip to main content

Dr. Neeru Chadha becomes first Indian women to be elected to ITLOS

Dr. Neeru Chadha, who had graduated from the University of Michigan and the University of Delhi, has been elected as the judge of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) becoming the first Indian woman to be elected to ITLOS. Dr. Chadha had joined the Legal and Treaties Division of the Ministry of External Affairs in 1992.

She was also India’s lead agent for both the case filed by Italy in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and at the arbitral tribunal in The Hague, which involved two Italian Marines who were accused of shooting dead two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012 and in the 2016 case before the International Court of Justice, raised by the Marshall Islands with respect to Nuclear Disarmament. 

Dr. Chadha (Left), with Mr. Harish Salve (Center) and French lawyer, Alain Pellet, representing India at the ICJ against the Marshall Islands in 2016.

Dr. Chadha is also the first woman from India to occupy a top UN position, after Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, who served as the President of the United Nations General Assembly. 




Mr. Syed Akbaruddin is India's Ambassador/Permanent Representative to the United Nations 



With this, she also becomes the 3rd female ITLOS Judge at this moment, besides Ms Liesbeth Lijnzaad of the Netherlands, who was also freshly elected and Elsa Kelly of Argentina, (who was elected in 2011).


She also becomes the second Indian, the first one being Justice P Chandrasekhara Rao who was reelected in October 2008, to currently a member of the ITLOS (Dr. Chadha's term officially commences from Oct 2017). The current President of the ITLOS is Russian born, Justice Vladimir Vladimirovich Golitsyn

The current batch of Judges, including Dr. Chadha, have been elected for a term of 9 years commencing 1st October 2017.

ITLOS Press Release can be accessed HERE

Bio Date and all details about the freshly elected Judges can be access HERE

Comments

Popular

Use Of Human Shield In Kashmir – A Legal Analysis

A lot has been debated and written about the ‘human shield’ incident that happened on April 9, 2017, in Kashmir’s Budgam district. Farooq Ahmed Dar, a 26-year-old shawl weaver of Chil village in Beerwah sub-district was tied in front of an Army Jeep and allegedly paraded through several villages for nearly five hours.[1] The media, lawyers, politicians and even army officers have stark differences of opinion on the legality of the said incident.[2] Major Leetul Gogoi, who tied the victim on the army jeep was awarded chief of army staff’s Commendation Card for sustained efforts in counter-insurgency operations.[3] This award was given pending proceedings before the court of inquiry into the said incident. On the other hand, the victim, Farooq Ahmed Dar approached the State Human Rights Commission against the reward given to Major Gogoi by the Army and separate petitions were filed before the National Human Rights Commission against the felicitation.[4] It is alleged that the actions of…

Qatar invokes ICJ Jurisdiction against UAE- Alleges Racial Discrimination

The State of Qatar on the 11th of July, instituted proceedings against the United Arab Emirates at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), with regard to alleged violations of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,1965 (hereinafter the “CERD”), to which both States are parties. Qatar invoked the ICJ's jurisdiction under Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court and Article 22 of the CERD. Qatar contended that the UAE has enacted and implemented a series of discriminatory measures directed at Qataris based expressly on their national origin [that] remain in effect to this day, resulting in alleged human rights violations. According to Qatar, on and following 5 June 2017, the UAE expelled all Qataris within its borders; prohibited them from entering or passing through the UAE; closed UAE airspace and seaports to Qatar and Qataris; interfered with the rights of Qataris who own property in the UAE; limited the rights of Qatar…

The Battle of the Oil Titans: Qatar drags UAE to the ICJ alleging violations of the CERD

In what can be said as a fresh face-off in already hostile relations between The State of Qatar and Gulf countries, the former acting under parens patraie doctrine has initiated proceedings at the International Court of Justice against United Arab Emirates (UAE) on 11th June invoking Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court and Article 22 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 1965 (hereinafter CERD). The proceedings come a year after Qatar was accused of funding terrorism in the region keeping in view its proximity with Iran and consequently, Egypt, Bahrain, UAE and Saudi Arabia severed its diplomatic and trade ties with it. Qatar (Applicant) in its application to the Court contends that “[t]he UAE has enacted and implemented a series of discriminatory measures directed at Qataris based expressly on their national origin [that] remain in effect to this day, resulting in alleged human rights violations.”
According to Qatar…